Game Rules, Ranking of Hands, Game Glossary and more - all about the poker game

Poker Myths

Uh, no. Trust me on this one–this is not true. Most winning limit hold 'em players will win around 60–80% of their sessions, depending on their playing style. This leaves 20–40% where their wallet leaves the casino lighter than when it first arrived. Bad players can and do get lucky–and often they keep getting lucky for weeks or even months on end. If you haven't started seriously playing yet, you'll soon see what I mean. If you're already a regular player then you know exactly what I'm talking about.

It is true that some great poker players seemed destined for greatness. Stu Ungar, for example, appears to have been such a player. But most solid poker players became winners by making a study of the game and working diligently on improving. I think it's probably safe to say that people who are born with a phlegmatic disposition have an easier time becoming winners, but having the proper mind–set is only a step one requirement. With a steady diet of practice and study I'm convinced that anyone can learn how to beat the game. I've run across plenty of winning players, and a lot of them had the 'card sense' of a koala bear. But they beat the game because they worked hard at it.

This gets misinterpreted into meaning that you need to bluff a lot so your good hands will make mucho money. My quarrel with this thinking is that the purpose of a bluff is to win the pot. It may not work, but there should be a reasonable chance of success. Those who bluff to advertise bluff too often and in situations where success is remote. A little bit of bluffing is enough to get you action on your good hands. Advertising is only a byproduct of bluffing, not the main purpose.

Even though it is helpful in any endeavor to have confidence, we must ask, "Where does that confidence come from?" When you see Tiger Woods get up on that eighteenth tee on national television and whack a big drive right down the middle, he looks confident. The reason for this confidence is certainly not that he hits slices into the boondocks on the practice tee, but thinks he can do well under pressure. No, no, no. The reason is he has performed so well on previous occasions that he feels he can do the same thing when the chips are down.

I would argue that it is vital for a poker player––or any gambler––to have a realistic view of his own strength. Should a $5–$10 limit player go into a trance, mumble fifty times to himself "I am the greatest," and then take a seat in a tough $50–$100 game? Would you want to stake him? Confidence is something that flows naturally as a result of successes. You don't swell your chest with confidence and then become successful; it's the other way around. The maxim should read, "A realistic appraisal of one's abilities is important for a player."

This is simply not true. There are only a few successful players that are super–aggressive. These players are better performers at tournament play than money play, and also are better at big–bet poker than limit play. Three–time World Champion Stu Ungar is a good example of this. A look at the guys who get the money year after year shows that being selectively aggressive works better than unrelenting pressure, if steady long–term results are the criterion. Look at such players as Chip Reese and Daniel Harrington to see what I mean.

Moreover, even when this hyper–aggressive style is made to work, it will surely not be harnessed by ordinary mortals like you or me. You need to be a real poker genius to know how to extricate yourself from the tough situations this style of play will continually place you. I'll guarantee you the ten most aggressive poker players in America are all busted! Don't be a wimp, but don't try to play in fast forward the whole session either.

This saying makes it sound like you need to blow thousands of dollars to become a good enough player just to break even. While this maxim certainly applies if you feel the need to start playing right away for high stakes, I don't believe it applies to low stakes––which is the level where most beginners belong. The cheap poker games have a lot of undisciplined players. I believe newcomers can at least break even simply by reading a book on poker and playing only good poker game hands. The shield of good starting hands should be enough for somebody to hold his own at games below $5–$10 limit, even without knowing the fine points of poker.